7 Levels of Compliance (Non-Normative)
Akoma Ntoso is a rich standard so it is possible to apply it at different levels of compliance.
| Structure and URIs/IRIs | sublevel A | Sublevel B | Sublevel C | Sublevel D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 uses the document structure defined in the Akoma Ntoso specifications (e.g., preface, preamble, body, conclusion, annexes) for the source as defined in the chapter 8 of this document (conformance). | basic metadata are added | normative references are used | advanced metadata are added | semantic elements are added |
| Level 2 uses the document structure and naming convention of URI/IRI (FRBR metadata) and the IDs according to the AKN naming convention as defined in Akoma Ntoso Naming Convention Version 1.0, chapter 4 and 5, or any functionally-equivalent Naming Convention as defined in Akoma Ntoso Naming Convention Version 1.0, section 4.12. | basic metadata are added | normative references are used | advanced metadata are added | semantic elements are added |
To help bodies find the most suitable subset of the Akoma Ntoso XML schema for their needs and requirements, a web service has been created to generate custom sub-schema, that can be accessed from http://akn.web.cs.unibo.it/aknssg/aknssg.html. Basic metadata correspond to sections:
-
- <identification> part with the FRBR;
-
- <publication> part where it makes sense;
-
- Normative references correspond to all elements using attributes href.
Advanced metadata correspond to elements:
-
- <lifecycle> part;
-
- <analysis> part;
-
- <workflow> part;
-
- <references> part.
Semantic elements are to elements: <date><time> <person> <organization> <concept> <object> <event> <location> <process> <role> <term>< quantity> <def><remark> <recordedTime> <vote> <outcome> <ins> <del> <omissis> <placeholder> <fillIn <decoration> <docType> <docTitle> <docNumber <docProponent> <docDate> <legislature> <session> <shortTitle> <docAuthority> <docPurpose> <docCommittee> <docIntroducer> <docStage> <docStatus> <docJurisdiction> <docketNumber> <courtType> <neutralCitation> <party> <judge> <lawyer> <signature> <opinion> <argument>